CRITICAL – In your own words describe the key differences between the portraits of George Washington and George III illustrated earlier in this blog.
Both images have a variety of similarities that connect them, mainly due to the fact they were both painted in a similar time period, by Anglo-American-British individuals. For starters, both George Washington and King George are depicted with the right hand on the hip, as well as the left hand resting on something nearby. I believe this to be the culture of the time and a common pose used to portray individuals in paintings. Aside from the pose however, a comparison of the two portraits reveals some key differences. The first noticeable difference is the gaze of each individual. King George is depicted gazing into the distance, which has a sort of pompous and royal affect. There is something distinctly English about it, almost as if he is looking away from his subjects, into the distance of vast British empire. George Washington on the other hand is depicted looking directly at the painter, which gives him a humble and relatable look, as if he is a leader of the people. His knowing eyes carry wisdom and strength. Washingtons countenance also appears to be more rugged and humble, as opposed to the royal and regal appearance of King George. Washington is dressed in simple military attire, which affirms he is a man of the people, a fighter, a striver, one who struggles with his subjects. George on the other hand is arrayed in fine gold linen, flowing silk and grand attire. One speaks of royalty, the other of humility. The colouring of each portrait as well as the backgrounds are also of stark contrast. The colours used to portray Washington are dark and drab whilst the background is cloudy and includes a man with a horse. The colours used to portray King George are of grandeur and magnificence, pink, gold, red and blue, with a background of flowing curtains and Roman pillars. In the portrait of King George, the sunlight is shining directly on him, highlighting him as the centre of the painting. On Washingtons portrait however, their seems to be an absence of light, highlighting the entire scene as relevant, not Just Washington. The image of Washington shows a departure from the traditional art of the English, that was of royalty, perfection and decadence. The art of America, clearly evolves here to be one of truth, of realism and of relevance.


Nice comparison between the two different painting and by doing so both cultures.
LikeLike
Thanks for the feedback Mitchell 😀
LikeLike
A great entry Jesse- and so good that you are able to build on your New York experience! Yes you actually did see these paintings in the MET! Not many can claim the same thing! An you speak well about the way these two images really do capture the fundamental difference between the two countries- and the reason why America had a revolution from that pompous world of British royalty….
Just a few corrections needed…..
Editing Needed (and some workshop follow-ups- see Purdue Owl for help: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/1/
* Washingtons countenance = Washington’s countenance [ ‘s or s’ – Apostrophe- if there is a meaning of ownership ( the boy’s apple/ the boys’ apples) then you need an apostrophe. See http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/621/01/. But don’t use apostrophe s for normal plurals!!!]
*On Washingtons portrait= On Washington’s portrait – ditto
*….their seems to be an absence of light,= …there seems to be an absence of light, – [their there they’re- http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/660/01/%5D
LikeLike
True that, very blessed to have viewed these in the MET! The pictures speak for themselves I think! Thanks for the feedback Michael 😀
LikeLike
For my second peer review, I chose to analyse your blog Jesse, where you articulately described the differences between the two portraits.
I was immediately captured by your starting point. The way you wrote this blog was perfect, and I could not stop reading it until it had finished. This was a very a concise blog, and you didn’t wander off onto a different subject. The way you explained the differences and similarities are well written and straight to the point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the feedback Sandy 😀
LikeLike
Great choice Jesse… I remember the moment well….
MG
LikeLike